Archive for the ‘Native Americans’ Category

Pre-Contact America

Sunday, April 5th, 2009

I realize that I am a bit behind the curve on this posting since it relates to Black Hawk and his ancestors, but I hope that you will find it interesting anyway.

Two years ago I had the pleasure of getting paid to hear and record a great book review on a book by Charles Mann, called 1491. The year 1492, as anyone who grew up in the U.S. well knows is the year that Christopher Columbus sailed from Spain across the Atlantic in search of an east-to-west route to Indian and/or China. Instead, he blundered into the Caribbean Sea and died convinced (or at least trying to convince others) that he had succeeded. The significance of that date is that it was considered the first contact of Europeans with American (New World) cultures. (There is some evidence that Vikings and/or Irish monks made it to Newfoundland as early as the mid-fourteenth century, but that’s another story. See The Brendan Voyage by Timothy Severne for more on that and see Farley Mowatt’s Book, The Farfarers: Before the Norse. Both are compelling reads, but neither have been accepted by the historic/archaeological communities as fact, but I digress.)

In his book, 1491, Charles Mann very thoroughly examines the historical accounts and archaeological research on just what the pre-Columbian peoples of north, central and south Americas were like. He makes three basic claims about all of these people: the populations were much greater than most historians thought; the cultures were much more advanced than we have given them credit for; and finally, that the lands on which they lived were carefully managed and even transformed by the people who lived there. Another way of stating this last claim is that most 19th century historians seem to portray the “Indians” as living in some sort of natural harmony or savage state within their environment much as buffalo, bears or wolves. Indeed, for much of the 19th century the North and South American native populations were viewed not so much as humans but as highly intelligent animals within their environments. What Mann brings to light is that from the grasslands of Argentina to the Canadian Maritimes and everywhere in between, Native Americans carefully managed the lands in which they dwelt, often built cities and grew huge amounts of food to sustain their large, often dense populations.

For the purposes of this class, I will focus on an ancient city now called The Cahokia Mounds, just across the Mississippi River from St. Louis, Missouri near Collinsville, Illinois. The city covered some six square miles (1554 hectares) and was, as Mann describes (p.259) “preeminent from about 950 to about 1250 A.D.” He goes on to say that this puts it on par with London within the same time frame. In its heyday (about 850 years ago) there were 15 to 20 thousand inhabitants, the houses were arranges in rows around open plazas with agricultural fields surrounded it. The central mound is an artificial hill with four terraces that would have been the highest thing around for miles when it was populated and is still the largest man-made earthen mound in North America. There are also remains of “wood henges” or large circles of telephone-size wooden posts that aligned with important celestial events and served as calendars. The city itself appears to have been carefully engineered as evidenced by the rows of houses but also because of numerous sightlines and alignments around the city and the construction of the mounds were carefully engineered to promote stability. This was not a culture of “noble savages” in the tradition of James Fennimore Copper’s The Last of the Mohicans and while Cahokia seems to have been the first and largest, it was not the only city of its kind. Over a six hundred year period, the Mississippian Culture stretched from Minnesota to Florida. These people traded and communicated over thousands of miles developed engineering and astronomy skills, arts and agricultural sciences and rivaled the cities of Europe in population and seem to have out-shown them in terms of quality of life. The Europeans who first encountered them remarked on their fine physical appearances and muscled bodies.

Archeologists point to an earthquake and related flood in the beginning of the 13th century (266) and the environmental social and religious upheaval that followed as the leading causes of Cahokia’s eventual abandonment, but even as Cahokia began its decline, other similar (though much smaller) cities emerged along the banks of the Mississippi.

In 1539, Hernando De Soto, famed mercenary, merchant and murderer, led a private army “through what is now Florida, Georgia, North and South Carolina, Tennessee, Alabama, Mississippi, Arkansas, Texas, and Louisiana, looking for gold and wrecking most everything it touched” (97). According to De Soto’s accounts, the area was “thickly set with towns.” They encountered strong resistance from numerous people all along the way and remarked in particular about the large number of towns around the present location of Memphis (98).

After De Soto himself died of a fever and his remaining soldiers limped home or died trying, no European visited the Mississippi region until 1682 when LaSalle and company canoed downriver from the Great Lakes. “LaSalle passed though an area where De Soto had found cities cheek by jowl. It was deserted – the French didn’t see a village for two hundred miles” (ibid.). Mann reports that De Soto and his crew traveled with pigs argues that any number of porcine-born diseases wiped out these thriving populations, not by De Soto’s brutal raids and greedy misanthropy, but because of the live, on the hoof, food he brought with him on the expedition (ibid.).

There are many, many more stories that Mann tells that show that the seeming “first” encounters between the North Americans and Europeans were actually long and drawn-out continuations of a long, sad tail of disease, ravaged civilizations, misunderstandings of the “natural” state of things and a poor appreciation of what really happened in those earliest periods of contact.

Sources

Mann, Charles C., 1491, Alfred Kopf (publ.) New York, 2005

wikipedia.org/wiki/Cahokia

www.cahokiamounds.com

www.mnsu.edu/emuseum/archaeology/sites/northamerica/cahokia.html

www.nps.gov/history/seac/misslate.htm

Related recommended reading:

Diamond, Jared Guns Germs, and Steel and Collapse

First Contact

Tuesday, March 24th, 2009

I realize that I am a bit behind the curve on this posting, but I hope that you will find it interesting anyhow.  Two years ago I had the pleasure of getting paid to hear and record a great book review on a book by Charles Mann, called 1491.  The year 1492, as anyone who grew up in the U.S. well knows is the year that Christopher Columbus sailed from Spain across the Atlantic in search of an east-to-west route to Indian and/or China.  Instead, he blundered into the Caribbean Sea and died convinced (or at least trying to convince others) that he had succeeded.  The significance of that date is that it was considered the first contact of Europeans with American (New World) cultures.  (There is some evidence that Vikings and/or Irish monks made it to Newfoundland as early as the mid-fourteenth century, but that’s another story.  See The Brendan Voyage by Timothy Severne for more on that and see Farley Mowatt’s Book, The Farfarers: Before the Norse. Both are compelling reads, but neither have been accepted by the historic/archaeological communities as fact.)  But back to Charles Mann: In his book, 1491,  he very thoroughly examines the historical accounts and archaeological research on just what the pre-Columbian peoples of north, central and south Americas were like.  He makes three basic claims about all of these people: the populations were much greater than most historians thought; the cultures were much more advanced than we have given them credit for; and finally, that the lands on which they lived were carefully managed and even transformed by the people who lived there.

“Native American Moccasin History” by Miranda Heckler

Thursday, February 5th, 2009

During class, we mentioned how traders had a limited supply of boots and how the Native Americans immediately noticed the footwear of the explorers and settlers.  Being a girl and obsessed with shoes, I became interested in Native American moccasins in a quest to learn about their history.

The word ‘moccasin’ came from an Algonquian word because they were the first tribe encountered by Europeans.  Although this word is accepted by all now, specific tribes would have used their own native word instead.

Native American clothing, including moccasins, varied from tribe to tribe.  However, the concept of the moccasin remained universal – a pair of slipper-like shoes made of tanned leather.  The basic construction of the moccasin remained the same throughout tribes, but the patterns were different.  Native Americans could actually identify members of other tribes based on their moccasin patterns.  For example, some names of large nations like Blackfoot or Chippewa actually referred to the moccasin styles.  These patterns were created with the use of beading, quillwork, and painting.  Moccasins belonging to Plains Native Americans often had undecorated cuffs and would sometimes cover the entire top of the shoe with beadwork.  They would also bury their dead with fully beaded moccasins, including the soles.

When it was mentioned in class that Native Americans would have wanted to own their own pair of boots like the explorers, I decided to explore how the Native Americans would have made their own more durable version of moccasins.  Apparently they could use hardened rawhide on the soles of the shoes to make them more durable.  Also, by adding rabbit fur (or sheep skin like today’s popular Uggs), the Native Americans could add warmth and extra comfort to their moccasins.

Each style of moccasin was designed based on the environment.  The harder-soled moccasins were more common in the western plains and desert areas.  This helped to protect feet from prairie grass and sharp rocks.  Softer-soled moccasins were primarily used for travel through wetlands and forests covered in pine needles.

(Background Information found at: www.marieshoes.com/site/1645168/page/766719)

Educational Websites:

http://www.nativetech.org/clothing/moccasin/moctext.html  -  This website has moccasin pattens depending on the region and style.  There is also a lot of background information on how the shoes were made.

http://www.wisconsinhistory.org/museum/collections/online/pictsrch.cfm?ParentID=735332  – This website has a gallery that shows images of different moccasin styles based on the Native American tribe.  I noticed some of the tribes we discussed are listed on this site, and I found it interesting to see the designs and styles.

http://www.shoeblog.com/blog/back-from-the-fashion-greveyard-fringed-leather-moccasins/  – This website was amusing to me.  Not only the Native Americans like the leather, fringe look of the moccasin, but also current fashion designers do.  This link will take you to a blog with images of modern moccasin style boots and heels.