No matter in which standard, Dreiser is not a leading character and maybe can only stay in an embarrassing position in the history of American literature. But he can describe the hero’s pursuit for woman, house and artwork in artistic ways in order to show that he advocates human instinct and enjoyment and his agreement with the new consumption ideology and propaganda of it. In a way, “Sister Carrie” is not going to overthrow capitalist system but publicize because people’s pursuit for comfort and enjoyment will promote economy without any doubt.
This book mainly talks about Carrie, the girl who was beautiful but timid, young, innocent, clever and vain and who was reluctant to leave her families and hometown, but filled with the dreams about the luxurious life in metropolis. She intended to make a living in Chicago alone, get together with her sister and then seek for new life. The dazzling lights of metropolis drove her to the train to Chicago, but she didn’t know lies, fake, wickedness and hypocrisy were covered by the lights. To survive, she successively became the lover of Drouet and Woodhurst, and at last took the opportunities to become a famous actress.
The most attractive section for me is the description of Carrie’s first time to enter the flourishing stores of Chicago. The thorough description of women’s eagerness for materials seems like the anatomy of me and the women around me. The hard job-hunting experience of Carrie and her life in sister’s home make me share her feeling.
The story turns into peace. To survive, she had to rely on someone and was attracted by the consideration and manner of the men who are much older than her. The feeling of the past 200 years is much the same with the feeling in modern times.
Elopement is a surprising turning point and the later changes of Hurstwood and Carrie’s destinies are the most important and wonderful point of this book in my opinion. One came down to a beggar and the other became independent without the need to cling to someone any more. The description about how Hurstwood gradually lost his confidence, abandoned oneself to vice and became callous to things, and the careful description of Hurstwood’s psychology makes me see the images of some people. With her own talent, good personality and good luck, Carrie finally achieved the success of his career, which is what I look forward to.
Though the novel doesn’t make much description about Carrie’s spiritual blankness after she became rich in material, this seems to be the finishing touch of main idea. Look, more money will not make spirit full. Such a tone like that seems to be within the expectation of modern people who are 200 years from that time and still feel empty in belief no matter how much money they have. In my opinion, though author doesn’t include it, how much substantial Carrie feels before?
The brother of Mrs. Vance was mentioned twice in the novel, the clever and nice looking man who held different attitudes to the social ethos of that time and reached some achievements in science. This seems to be a virtual image, but this is the hope to move forward.
At last, the suicide of Hurstwood is reasonable, but the novel still sighs for the economic crisis.
I like Dreiser’s detailed description about one’s psychology, including the analysis of one’s personality, so much so that I seem to read one’s heart. It is hard to make this in reality.
Carrie is the girl with inborn intelligence and good taste which is the basic for her success.
Someone said she was a successful woman because she searched for her dream in a new city with her youth and beauty and finally reached to resplendence step by step; someone said she was a failure because she chased for the pompous and virtual life and ran away without mercy once a man’s glory faded, and at last had to dream about the unreachable happiness in her rocking chair; someone said she was a trouble woman because the gentleman-like Hurstwood lost all reputations and died outside because of her.
Did she ever love the Drouet who gave her material enjoyment? No. She lived with him just because the money she could get from him was more than her weekly salary which was 4 dollars. Was she evil-minded? Of course not. She was kind-hearted in nature only that she couldn’t resist the attraction of peacockery. She sold her conscience to exchange for the richness in material, but she didn’t regret. Her story was made the social background of that time. Otherwise, her future would be uncertain.
Did she ever love the former manager Hurstwood who lost all his reputation? Maybe yes. But what is more is that she made a dirty trade with her beauty. She was eager for a good marriage, but the Hurstwood, who eloped with her with the money, didn’t truly love her. Between them, love was too far to reach.
Someone said “actress is hardhearted in nature”, but who has made the so called “actress is hardhearted in nature”? Actresses themselves or external environment? If they are really so hardhearted, how can they devote all their feeling to the plays to make the characters they play so real? It is just that they have experienced too many hardships in life and can’t devote their true feeling to real life or put their true love to one person.
Carrie was a pure and kind girl and could originally have better life and get the perfect love in her heart, but her effort for life made her lose that true love in her heart and subject her to blankness and loneliness. In the end, she became a famous actress of that time and could live independently, which proved that her survival power was infinite. Someone will argue since she has infinite power to survive, why does she rely on rich men and trade with them with her beauty at the start? But who has ever thought how terrible it could be for a pure and kind girl to move to a strange city alone? If she hadn’t made this choice, she would have had to live in the darksome bunkhouse and live tasteless life every day. Who ever want to live that kind of life?
Her departure may seem heartless. But is this she? I don’t think so. It is not hard to see that she did have some feeling toward Drouet and Hurstwood at first, but the real life didn’t allow her to embrace this love. How could those men living in the so called upper society give up the dissipated for an innocent country girl? They just wanted to have a new taste now and then and possess another thing to show off. Her vainglory didn’t allow her to return to the past life, so she wanted to change the past life and was willing to sacrifice her youth and body. If not for her beauty, would Drouet help her at first? If Hurstwood didn’t contend for her for her beauty, would she make such achievements? I think the answers to the two questions would be “no”. It was just because of these two so called high-class men that this little girl could accumulate so much social experience, wasn’t it? It was just they that made today’s Carrie, wasn’t it? To the regret, after Carrie opened the door of destiny with hope, she went through it with confidence and then went to open another door; she bet with her youth but only got loneliness. Society created such sadness for Carrie but she copied such sadness and made herself walk to the abysm of life step by step. She asked for her experience. Why did she trust the sweet words of the men she didn’t know much at all without a careful consideration?
In fact, the image and embodiment of Carrie become more common in real life, so much so that people no longer feel surprised at her story, nor will they pay much attention to such a story. Everyone wants to own gorgeous life, the peace of life, true love and become famous in a night, but real life can’t offer us whatever we want. Love must be given up for life. We all know we can’t fill our stomach with love or survive with love alone, not to mention the love today is nothing more than a trade! To own true love and status, one must give up something. You must give first and then get back. The Drouet was the salesman who was mild, quiet, and confident and liked to advance to women, and the man with rich social experience who had ever travelled to many places. If not for him, how could Carrie possibly have such an ending? But he treated Carrie nothing more than a passing traveler in his life. In fact, how could such a man like him possibly give his true heart to Carrie? It is not hard for us to see that this man also had vainglory and wanted someone to remember his good. In the argument with Carrie, he told Carrie to remember his good and be thankful for the great help he had offered. But later, after Carrie became famous, he had the cheek to meet her and ask her to return to his side, in order to show how capable he was. He was not sincere to meet her, otherwise, how could he possibly date another woman on the same day? This can prove this man’s falsity.
As for Hurstwood, he was the former manager of the hotel and the man who was sophisticated, easygoing and capricious. But he couldn’t resist Carrie’s beauty and was defeated by her unique charm. But his character had been gradually formed by his vocation and the result always played the role in his slow, painful and sad degeneration. His ending is the saddest. Others lived the rich life, but his life became worse and worse, and in the end, he had to end his sadness with death. We can say that he was worth his ending for his greed and evil ideas. His life and future were destroyed by his temporary greed. What is more pathetic is that he didn’t have the courage to express his heart to the one he loved, nor did he put down his pride to consider and work hard for the future. The changes inside him tell the degeneration process of a man. He intended to own her and live the kind of rich and high-class life, but he didn’t want to put down his pride to work for breads. In his heart, he always thought of his splendent past and always thought he was the most excellent and should be worth better life, only that he hadn’t met a chance. To the regret, his thought and behavior finally destroyed him. He didn’t know only the effort could bring better life and an opportunity would not come until he was willing to put down everything and worked hard for life. In the end, he ended up with begging for life and lived in poverty and soreness. Even in this situation, he didn’t forget Carrie. He came to her to beg for some money to live in his most difficult situation. At first, he begged with his love, but later turned his love into hate and anger. In fact, it would be better to say that once he lost his social position in Chicago, his tragedy was started.
If a man has to live in this way, I think it would be better for him to leave this world because he was not only losing his face and bringing shame to his past, but also would add to others’ burden. It can say that his death was also a good way out because at least he didn’t have to sell his labor, or see others’ face or go begging any more. A man must live with dignity. While you don’t respect yourself, how can you make others respect you? Put down everything, start from the start and work hard for life. At least, doing these is not a waste of time in this world.
The wife of the former manager Hurstwood, Julia is a cruel, selfish, jealous and peacocky woman. For her own rights, she could expel her husband out of home. In fact, it can say that she married Hurstwood not for true love, but to satisfy her own vanity, money and status. She is also the woman with profane halo. The daughter of the former manager, Jessica is a spoiled, vainglorious and non-filial noble girl. They both have a good ending owning a valuable love, becoming the wife and mother-in-law of a rich man. Mrs. Vance is a young married woman who is beautiful and sociable and likes doing crazy things and going to cinema. She is the good friend of Carrie and sometimes gave her blank inner world a drop of spring and temporary happiness.
Why didn’t Carrie feel happy while enjoying rich material life? Anyone who lives in the city wants to live a rich life and hopes to have his/her own house, car and saving. Why did Carrie still feel unhappy with these conditions in hand? In fact, when she just arrived in Chicago, in the train, she was eager and looked forward to her present life so much. When she truly owned the life she wanted, why did she feel unhappy and lonely? Why? What should be the final goal of life toward happiness?
In fact, it is never wrong to pursue for high standard and high class life. It is right to pursue for material life, but it is not a goal. To live happily and meaningfully, one should have trustful and true friends, a warm and sweet family and take his/her own responsibilities and obligations.
Ames, this young man’s unique attitudes attracted Carrie, but she wouldn’t feel special toward him because of this. She had so much understandings and social experience about her life and big city that she wouldn’t easily devote her own love. But, it can say that this boy made Carrie understand more about the contents, stories and feelings of books and made her live in an ocean of books and find comfort in the books.
In this world, to make a success, you are needed to give up some valuable things and have enough courage. Everyone wants to live a rich life, but this kind of life is not available to anyone. I think this is impossible. If everyone becomes rich, what standard should be adopted to show they are rich? It is right to pursue for material life, but it is not everything. With rich material life, we can live, but we can still go on without it. Don’t let the interests of material life blind your heart and don’t give up the life you want for material interests. One should be sincere to others and the world and treat others with a true heart, so that he /she will live the life he/she wants and his/her life will be meaningful in this world.
In fact, man’s life is not long, nor short. It is up to the way you live. It is bitter to live with a death heart, loneliness and the intention to chase for material life. Besides outer things, we have many more inner things to chase for. Why can’t we be reasonable in the pursuit for these to make our life meaningful?
Dreiser’s works are very real and practical just like USA.
“Go on, go on”, said by humanity. Don’t be sad, don’t linger around, don’t regret. Destiny is pushing you forward and forward…… I have these words in my mind every time I find there is no road behind me. I have these words in my heart every time I feel depressed.
An answer is not the most important in the examinations given by life because we will never know the result. You have no idea where your choices will take you because there are always doors for your choice after you get through one door. To be more justly, there is no right or wrong because you are always given a choice until the moment you leave this world. By then, though you already know the positions of traps, hidden passages, wrong paths and treasures, you no longer have another choice because you already reach the termination and are not allowed to start over. The ones given the choices will be the people after you. They may repeat the choices you have made. Therefore, there are unavoidable repeated mistakes in the history.
There is no such thing as real success or failure. This is the unbearable lightness of being and your insistence will make the god laugh.
Wait, wait, I have other words to tell.
But, there is no god in the world. Who dare to laugh at me!
Carrie is like this. She opened one door hopefully and then another when she felt disappointed, so she kept putting her hands on the doorknobs, turning and opening. No one could tell whether she already failed. When one gets tired of the life and stops trying, this is the real failure of life. He always thought of the fruitless road he ever got through, the past refulgence, the value things he lost and didn’t hold any hope for the things behind the door. At this time, no matter where he was, he already failed.
So, success or failure is like this. It is not measured by the situation you are in, but your heart and state.
Saul Bellow Starting Out in Chicago
July 8th, 2009 by Arvid SponbergSaul Bellow’s essay, “Starting Out in Chicago,” published in American Scholar in 1974, takes us back to Chicago in the 1930s. Bellow recalls “what it was like to set oneself up to be a writer in the Midwest during the thirties” and acknowledges the influence of Anderson, Dreiser, Masters, and Lindsay. But the essay offers more than nostalgia. Writing with a 40-year perspective, Bellow comments on the predicament of all writers in the 1970s: “If I had to name the one force in America that opposes the symbolic discipline of poetry today . . . I would say the Great Noise. The enemy is noise. . . .not simply the noise of technology, the noise of money or advertising and promotion, the noise of media, the noise of miseducation, but the terrible excitement and distraction generated by the crises of modern life. . . . Contributing to it are the real and unreal issues, ideologies, rationalizations, errors, delusions, nonsituations that look real, nonquestions demanding consideration, opinions, analyses in the press, on the air, expertise, inside dope, factional disagreement, official rhetoric, information–in short, the sounds of the public sphere, the din of politics, the turbulence and agitation that set in about 1914 and have now reached an intolerable volume. . . . William Wordsworth, nearly two hundred years ago, expressed his concern over the effects of modern turbulence on poetry. He was right, too. But in the language of my youth–”He didn’t know the half of it.”
How about the tenth of it, Saul? You ought to hear it now. Read the full essay at
“Starting Out in Chicago” by Saul Bellow
Posted in A Sense of Place, Commentary on Texts, Essays, Fiction, Memoir | No Comments »